Beginner
Intermediate
Advanced

Tezos vs Ethereum: Consensus Mechanisms, Smart Contracts, and Beyond

October 16, 2024
5 min

Blockchain technology has become transformative, powering decentralized applications, enhancing transaction security, and transforming digital asset management. Among the many platforms driving change in this industry, Tezos and Ethereum are two of the most prominent. Both platforms have affected crypto significantly, pushing the boundaries of smart contract development, governance, and scalability.

This article aims to provide a detailed comparison of Tezos and Ethereum, helping to highlight their strengths, weaknesses, and potential use cases.

What is Tezos 

Tezos was launched in 2018 after a highly successful initial coin offering (ICO) that raised $232 million. It was designed to address some of the limitations faced by earlier blockchain networks, particularly around governance and the ability to upgrade the platform without hard forks.

Key Features

  • On-chain governance: Tezos allows stakeholders to vote on protocol upgrades, ensuring smooth governance and evolution of the platform.
  • Self-amending: The protocol can upgrade itself through a decentralized voting process, which prevents network splits caused by hard forks.
  • Proof of Stake (PoS): Unlike many early blockchains, Tezos launched with a PoS consensus mechanism, making it more energy-efficient.

What is Ethereum?

Ethereum, launched in 2015 by Vitalik Buterin and a team of developers, introduced the concept of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps), transforming blockchain capabilities. As the first platform to support a wide range of programmable transactions, Ethereum became the foundation for a large portion of the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem.

Key Features

  • Smart contract functionality: Ethereum revolutionized blockchain technology by enabling programmable contracts that can execute based on predefined conditions.
  • Widespread adoption: Ethereum's flexible programming language, Solidity, has attracted a large developer community and has become the go-to platform for dApp development.
  • Transition to Ethereum 2.0: Ethereum has transitioned to a PoS consensus mechanism from a Proof-of-Work (PoW) one, aiming to improve scalability and energy efficiency.

Consensus Mechanisms

Tezos

Tezos employs a Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism known as Liquid-Proof-of-Stake (LPoS). In LPoS, validators, referred to as bakers, create and validate new blocks. Stakeholders can delegate their tokens to bakers without transferring ownership, which democratizes participation.

Benefits:

  • Energy efficiency: PoS is much less resource-intensive than Proof of Work (PoW) mechanisms, making Tezos more environmentally sustainable.
  • Security: LPoS has built-in incentives for bakers to act honestly, and the system reduces the likelihood of centralization.

Drawbacks:

  • Delegation centralization: Over time, larger bakers can accumulate more power if smaller stakeholders consistently delegate to them.

Ethereum

Ethereum originally launched with a Proof of Work (PoW) mechanism, where miners solved complex cryptographic puzzles to validate transactions. However, with Ethereum 2.0, it is transitioning to Proof of Stake (PoS) via the Beacon Chain. This shift was designed to improve scalability and energy consumption.

Benefits:

  • Energy efficiency: Like Tezos, PoS drastically reduces the energy requirements of Ethereum, making it more sustainable.
  • Scalability improvements: PoS will allow Ethereum to implement sharding in the future, which can improve transaction throughput.

Drawbacks:

  • Transition complexity: Ethereum’s transition from PoW to PoS has been challenging and has taken years to fully implement, raising concerns about execution and coordination.

Governance Models

Tezos

Tezos prides itself on its on-chain governance, where token holders can vote on proposals for protocol changes and upgrades. The protocol’s self-amending feature allows these upgrades to be implemented without requiring hard forks, ensuring a smoother evolution of the platform.

Implications:

  • Decentralized decision-making: Token holders have a direct say in the future of the platform.
  • Agility: Tezos can upgrade quickly and without disruptions, as seen with its frequent protocol updates.

Ethereum

Ethereum uses a more traditional, off-chain governance system, where major decisions are typically guided by the Ethereum Foundation and a group of core developers. Changes are proposed through Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs), which are reviewed and debated by the community before implementation.

Implications:

  • Less direct community involvement: While the community can propose EIPs, most governance power is concentrated among developers and key stakeholders.
  • Slower upgrade process: Major changes, such as Ethereum’s move to PoS, can take years due to the complexity of coordination.

What is Tezos (XTZ)?

Tezos’ native token is XTZ, often referred to as Tez. It plays a key role in the network’s functionality, serving multiple purposes:

  • Staking/Baking: XTZ is used in the Liquid Proof of Stake (LPoS) mechanism, where holders can either stake (or "bake") their tokens to help secure the network and validate transactions. Bakers are rewarded with additional XTZ tokens for their participation in securing the network.
  • Governance: XTZ holders have voting rights on proposals for network upgrades. This on-chain governance feature empowers token holders to directly influence the development of the Tezos protocol.
  • Transaction Fees: Like many blockchain platforms, XTZ is also used to pay for transaction fees and executing smart contracts within the Tezos ecosystem.

Tezos has a relatively modest inflation rate due to the staking rewards, which increases its token supply over time, though the on-chain governance system allows for potential adjustments to these parameters.

What is Ethereum (ETH)?

Ethereum’s native token is ETH, which is integral to the functioning of the Ethereum network:

  • Transaction Fees (Gas): On Ethereum, ETH is used to pay gas fees for executing smart contracts and processing transactions. These fees vary based on network congestion and the complexity of the contract being executed.
  • Staking: With the introduction of Ethereum 2.0, ETH holders can participate in the Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism by staking their tokens in exchange for rewards. This process contributes to securing the network and helps validate transactions.
  • Smart Contracts and dApps: ETH is also the primary currency used within the vast array of decentralized applications (dApps) on the Ethereum platform. From DeFi protocols to NFT marketplaces, ETH is the dominant currency used in transactions across the ecosystem.

While ETH doesn’t have a fixed supply limit, Ethereum introduced EIP-1559, which burns a portion of the gas fees, creating a deflationary pressure on the token, especially during times of high network activity. This mechanism has the potential to reduce the overall supply of ETH over time, increasing its value.

Smart Contracts and dApps

Tezos

Tezos supports smart contracts using its Michelson programming language, designed to prioritize security and formal verification, guaranteeing the reliability of code. This has led to Tezos being favored for use cases requiring high security, such as tokenization and digital art.

Ethereum

Ethereum’s smart contract capabilities are more mature, primarily due to its widespread adoption and the use of Solidity, a flexible programming language. The Ethereum network is the backbone of the DeFi space and supports the majority of dApps across various sectors.

Security and Decentralization

Tezos

Tezos prioritizes security through formal verification, a process that mathematically proves the correctness of smart contracts. This focus has helped Tezos maintain a strong security track record with no major security breaches to date.

Ethereum

Ethereum’s large network and widespread use make it a frequent target for attacks. While Ethereum is highly secure and decentralized, there have been notable security incidents, such as the DAO hack in 2016, which led to a controversial hard fork.

Conclusion

Both Tezos and Ethereum are powerful blockchain platforms, each with unique strengths. Tezos excels in governance, security, and efficiency, making it ideal for use cases requiring high levels of decentralization and regulatory compliance. Ethereum, with its large ecosystem and developer base, remains the dominant platform for DeFi and dApps, though its scalability challenges are being addressed with Ethereum 2.0.

Risk Disclosure Statement

The information provided in this article is for educational and informational purposes only and should not be construed as financial, tax, or legal advice or recommendation. Dealing with virtual currencies involves significant risks, including the potential loss of your investment. We strongly recommend you obtain independent professional advice before making any financial decisions. The products and services offered by Cryptology may not be suitable for all users and may not be available in certain countries or jurisdictions. The promotional materials do not guarantee any specific outcomes or profits from virtual trading. Past performance is not indicative of future results. It is important to read and understand the risks, which are explained in our Risk Disclosure Statement

Katya V.

Katya is one of Cryptology’s skilled content managers and a writer with a diverse background in content creation, editing, and digital marketing. With experience in several different industries, mostly blockchain and others like deep tech, they have refined their ability to craft compelling narratives and develop SEO strategies.